DAWES: LIVE FROM YOUR DESK
Feb 22, 2005, 3:21:12 AM by Rufus Dawes - FAQ
Every morning, millions of working men and women – and many more than a few who are out of work – rise from their
beds and turn on the coffee pots and subsequently their computers. No more looking outside for the boy on his bicycle
who is bringing the morning newspaper, they turn instead to the humming sounds of their machines and enter the
blogosphere and, perhaps, become bloggers themselves.
Drawing upon content from the world’s media and the World Wide Web, bloggers operate in a world of new
agenda-setting power ranging from politics to American football. What began as merely a way to pass time has suddenly
become a powerful tool to influence world leaders, journalists, and the person who sits at the desk next to you.
The word blog didn’t exist until a few years ago. It’s short for weblogs, which are periodically updated journals,
providing online commentary with minimal or no external editing. They are usually presented as a set of “posts,” or
entries of news or commentary on news.
Blogs often include hyperlinks to other sites, enabling the commentators to draw upon the content of the entire
World Wide Web. Some are personal diaries, analysis, or offer advice on any number of subjects. Many bloggers operate
under pseudonyms (ahem!) and risk termination from their jobs for operating them on company time. Blogging, says
Jonathan Segal, an employment attorney, “is inconsistent with the business mission,” advising that “most employers as
of now do not have blogging policies, just as 10 years ago they didn’t have e-mail policies and now they do.” (Amy
Joyce, Washington Post, February 11, 2005)
According to blogger Ed Driscoll, “the cost of putting up a Web site ranges from free to a hundred bucks or so a
month.” The number of blogs continues to grow at a dizzying pace. In 1999, the total number of blogs was estimated to
be around 50; five years later, the estimates range from 2.4 million to 4.1 million. The Pew Internet & American
Life Project revealed that there are eight million personal Web logs today, but I’ve seen estimates that by the end of
this year more than 10 million blogs will have been created.
The site you are visiting right now is not a blog but it has features that are blog-like and they are among its most
popular. The official site of the Chiefs (www.kcchiefs.com) is really a blend of conventional news – much of it
decidedly pro-Chiefs – transcripts from official events or media sessions, injury reports, cheerleader appearances,
official history, and opinion columns. This column has many more of the features of a blog than what you will find in
ones written by Bob Gretz and Jonathan Rand. It takes what’s out there and comments on it and although Gretz does it
from time to time, he does less of it than this author does.
Conventional media have gotten into the act, a sure sign that they feel the growing pressure of competition from the
blogs or other independent sites. Even non-print media like radio stations have their own sites where they include
audio of programming along with personality profiles of hosts or disc jockeys. Driscoll remembers when “Rush Limbaugh
began his national radio show in 1988, Ed McLaughlin, his producer had to go from station to station to get them to buy
his show.” By comparison, when Limbaugh went on the Net, he was able to reach a national audience almost immediately
for the cost of a Web server.
Now let’s not lose our minds and believe that a couple million bloggers can change the world. Howard Dean took an
early lead in the Democratic primaries because he was able to tap into the power of the Internet but when it came time
to push the buttons to elect a candidate he fell well short. But bloggers did help take CBS News down a peg when
they exposed documents as forgeries purporting that George Bush received special privileges in the National Guard.
Moreover, blog sites really took off around 9/11 when the Web servers at CNN and New York Times were
maxed out and the breaking news was coming from small sites around the city.
Some bloggers have become so adept at fact-checking that we now see many more retractions and corrections than we
used to see. Well, not always. Still, it’s fun when a blogger points out when a local columnist turned talk show host
prattles on how Marty Schottenheimer is such a great coach, the man who truly turned the franchise around, conveniently
forgetting in the meantime, that only a few years earlier he had taken special pride in promoting Schottenheimer as the
personification of what was wrong with the team, going so far as to take credit for running him out of Kansas City.
“We’re going to run Carl Peterson out of town just like Marty,” he once boasted. (KCTE-AM, July 20, 1999)
I’d like to believe that those of us writing columns on this site have turned a few lights on for readers who
readily follow what’s being said about the Chiefs, maybe cleared up a few misconceptions or just given you a different
perspective. But I’d be totally out of line to suggest that everybody buys what we’re selling even when we’re required
to cite figures or supporting evidence that what we’re writing about is true.
In the final analysis, what’s great about the blogosphere is it’s so accessible. Find the ones who share your tastes
and leanings, and you’ll have attained the ne plus ultra of bespoke media: the ghastly double of yourself.
The opinions offered in this column do not necessarily reflect those of the Kansas City Chiefs.
Prodigiously well-researched, informative and opinionated, Rufus Dawes examines media coverage of the Chiefs occasionally throughout the year.